
Never miss whisky news, reviews, and new releases again.
Add Whisky Monkeys as a Google favoriteUncle Nearest, a renowned American whisky maker, is under fire. The distillery is caught in the crossfire with one of its major creditors. What's the story?
Update – Uncle Nearest Placed Under Immediate Receivership
The judge handling the case between Uncle Nearest and Farm Credit Mid-America has made a swift decision. A receiver has been appointed with immediate effect to oversee the assets of the distillery.
Verdict still unclear
The appointment of a receiver does not mean the distillery is automatically at fault, nor that the lender is suddenly entitled to $108 million. The receiver’s role is solely to ensure that the lender’s investment is protected as securely as possible.
The judge stated:
'The court appreciates defendants’ position, but it finds that appointing a receiver is necessary under the circumstances.'
Owners Fawn and Keith Weaver are no longer involved in the day-to-day operations, which must now be handled by the receiver. However, they are still permitted to represent the brand externally.
For Farm Credit Mid-America, this is a sign that the lender is in the right, but Uncle Nearest argues that the decision actually harms the distillery’s reputation.
Original message:
FAQ
- Who is Uncle Nearest clashing with?
With Farm Credit Mid-America.
- What's the issue?
The creditor accuses the distillery of payment defaults.
- What is the alleged debt?
More than 108 million dollars.
A Colossal Loan
The American distillery Uncle Nearest is in a significant dispute with Farm Credit Mid-America. This creditor has filed a lawsuit against the whisky maker, alleging that the distillery is defaulting on its bills. There are said to be various loans that each have not been repaid by the American whisky producer.
An overdue amount of more than 108 million dollars is reportedly outstanding. This sum includes loans and interest for the creditor.
Read also
It's Not Just About the Money
For Farm Credit Mid-America, it's about more than just money. There was reportedly a financing for Uncle Nearest that shouldn't have been granted. This was provided to let the distillery start making cognac, but there's no sign of this endeavor. Furthermore, Farm Credit Mid-America cites the submission of seemingly inaccurate inventory reports as a reason for the lawsuit.
In connection with the debt and the unclear financing, Farm Credit Mid-America is demanding that a curator be appointed. This would need to happen to protect the collateral of the creditor, because the whisky maker does not provide clarity about ongoing matters.
Uncle Nearest Is Clueless
The distillery responded to the allegations in early August. The accusations are incorrect and very offensive, according to co-founder Fawn Weaver.
What the creditor aims to achieve with the lawsuit is unclear to her. The date for the lawsuit has not been announced. As for now, this does not affect the availability of the whisky.
Fun Fact: Uncle Nearest is named after Nathan "Nearest" Green, an enslaved distiller who is recognized as the man who taught Jack Daniel the trade.
Read also
loading
POPULAR NEWS

Yamazaki’s New Japanese whisky reveals a surprising side of Spanish oak casks

Update -A famous whisky distillery has closed – now 20,600 bottles are up for grabs

These 5 Japanese Whiskies Have Been Crowned Liquid Gold (And You Won’t Know Every Name)

From Amrut to Indri: These Indian Whiskies Are Turning Heads in 2026

Scotland Fears for the Future of Single Malt Whisky: Here’s Why

Johnnie Walker Embraces K-Pop with a New Collaboration

The Macallan Releases a 1987 Whisky-with a Twist in Its Maturation

Lagavulin 8 vs Lagavulin 16: Why the Younger Islay Single Malt Could Come Out on Top

Review: St. James's Blend: A remarkably delicious whisky accident

From The Lord of the Rings to Game of Thrones: 5 Whiskies for True Fans
LATEST COMMENTS
- Thank you for the compliment. I really appreciate it.M0nkey31-08-2026
- I enjoyed reading the different approaches to building a whisky collection. Whether you collect by region, style, or limited releases, discovering new brands keeps the hobby interesting. Soorahi is another premium whisky worth considering for collectors looking to explore the evolving world of quality whiskies.dinesh04-08-2026
- There is no distillery equipment there and also no licences to produce or sell alcohol.TRC19-12-2025
- Hi Yvonne, Thank you for your response and for sharing the video. Unfortunately, the evidence you referred to consists only of two people talking about the whisky, without any explanation or identification. We have not spoken to the individuals in the video ourselves, nor can we verify who they are. We describe it as a Chinese whisky because it is released by a Chinese distillery. As you mentioned, the distillery has chosen to label the product as “pure malt” instead of “Chinese whisky.” Based on that, we do not believe they are doing anything illegal.M0nkey16-11-2025
- So - you have the proof......where's your write up?Yvonne16-11-2025
- You are absolutely right. Luckily that doesn't matter for the taste of the whisky. Have you tried it yet?M0nkey05-11-2025
- Guess what? Finland is not part of Scandinavia.Gray105-11-2025
- Throw in the towel? You mean restructure to compete and win in a challenging industry environment.WestwardFounder21-10-2025
- There is nothing legally to prevent the English whisky GI from coming into force, it complies with all the relevant laws and the single malt definition follows the precedent of Welsh whisky and US whiskyChefBear15-10-2025
- Three emails sent (two with videos, linked to a Google Drive Share). 1. The original video. 2. The video with subtitles as it was shared on YouTube 3. Screen grab of the YouTube channel where the video was blocked due to Pernod Ricard lobbying. The story was covered on Drinks Intel at the time - link here - https://drinks-intel.com/subscriber-news/pernod-ricards-the-chuan-pure-malt-whisky-not-sourced-solely-from-china-global-drinks-intel-exclusive/Yvonne10-10-2025




